Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 12
Attacker wins (British/American): 3
Defender wins (German): 9
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
| Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
|---|
| 947 | 988 | 44% | 2024-03-24 | Lost |
| 881 | 1006 | 33% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
| 1133 | 1164 | 46% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
| 986 | 991 | 49% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
| 1106 | 1133 | 46% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
| 907 | 898 | 51% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
| 898 | 907 | 49% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
| 1191 | 1208 | 48% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
| 963 | 986 | 47% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
| 1083 | 916 | 72% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
| 981 | 1098 | 34% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
| 1075 | 983 | 63% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (3 wins) average ELOs: 1012.6 vs 1023.2 has a 48.48% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).